LIMBAUGH: It’s Obvious ‘The Democrats Want And NEED Roy Moore To WIN’

RUSH: Nathan in Lynchburg, Virginia, you’re next. Great to have you, sir.

CALLER: Hey, season’s greetings. I wanted to wish, first of all, the greatest preacher of politics a very, very Merry Christmas and a happy New Year.

RUSH: Thank you. I appreciate that. Same to you, sir.

CALLER: It’s a pleasure to talk to you, sir. Can I make a prediction and tell me what you think?

RUSH: Yeah. Fire away.

CALLER: I think Moore is gonna win it today, and not by a small amount. And I want to go ahead and say that this is gonna be a wake-up call and a referendum to the establishment, to the media specifically. And I also think that it’s going to show the Democrat strategy of all the sexual harassment, that it’s not working, that the people of Alabama aren’t gonna fall for this trick, even though the media and everyone else is saying Moore did this, Moore did that. And I think it’s going to be good for America to bring about a problem solving technique to all the sexual harassment. ‘Cause right now it’s like the wild, wild west out there for most men who are in a position of power. You don’t see much of it happening —

RUSH: Well, I know that you are hoping that there would be a media comeuppance. You would love to sit there and watch these people and see the realization on their faces that they’ve been wrong about everything and it’s come to Jesus day. And I hate to tell you you’re never going to see it. Because they are never going to do it. They are poison. There is literal poison running through their veins and their arteries and their loins and whatever circuitry is in their brains. They literally have been poisoned.

Even the New York media, they’re not even interested in this terror attack. They can’t be bothered to report on that which happened on their own turf because that would prove Trump right again about the need to vet visas and refugees. They’re never gonna do anything that acknowledges they think Trump was right about anything. If Roy Moore wins, that’s their plan. Everything they are doing, Nathan, today is rooted in the hope and belief they have that Roy Moore wins.

If I were this Doug Jones guy, I would feel kind of sold out by these people. ‘Cause it’s paramountly obvious the Democrats want and need Roy Moore to win. Roy Moore winning is what justifies the latest political scheme and conspiracy they’ve hatched.

Now, they’ll take Roy Moore losing, don’t misunderstand, and they’ll throw a big party, and they’ll make it look like it was the greatest thing; but they’re not gonna be disappointed if Roy Moore wins. Roy Moore winning fuels their plan to get rid of Trump. They’re just gonna add Roy Moore to the allegations against Trump and say that both of them need to resign, both of them are reprobates, perverts, what have you, however they choose to go about this.

But if Moore wins and even wins big, as you say, it’s not gonna be a wake-up moment for ’em. They are prepared for it. Some of them even hoping for it, because it is what will fuel what they’ve already revealed as their strategy. Now, Nathan, thanks. I appreciate the call.


LIMBAUGH: REAL Sexual Harassment Is Being Corrupted By The Democrat Party

RUSH: Okay. Let’s go to the phones. We will start in Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania. Hi, Lynn. Great to have you on the EIB Network today. How are you?

CALLER: I’m good. This is the first time I’ve ever called in and I’m calling in because of outrage. Two points. First point, very quickly: How can they come after Trump for unsubstantiated accusations when Clinton went on national TV and admitted his abuse? Second, more importantly —

RUSH: Whoa, whoa, whoa. Hold it a minute. When did Clinton admit it? He lied about it. He said he didn’t do it.

CALLER: I’m under the impression that he finally went on TV and apologized to the American public? Didn’t he?

RUSH: I don’t recall if he did that or not.

CALLER: All right. That’s my impression that he did, and there’s the dress. Whatever. But more importantly, I’m outraged with the women of this country. I’m a professional woman of over 30 years and I have been harassed dozens times. As a woman — as an adult, professional or not — we all have the opportunity to say “no,” shut the door, or walk away. I know, in fact, for a fact. I worked for a woman who had a deliberate affair with a superior and then turned around and sued for millions and got it.

And it’s reprehensible. And I don’t believe these women. They’re out for notoriety and/or money. There are women who are absolutely unintentionally and unwantingly harassed and raped and whatever. But it’s my belief because I’ve seen it so much in my profession that there are women that allow that to happen and then turn around and point the finger, and that outrages me. Because I have successfully said, “No, thank you,” walked away. And I don’t sue. If I had, I’d be worth millions today!

RUSH: Well, I hear you. I have to tell you, I’m very sympathetic to women who are abused/harassed by men who have the ability to fire them, to cut their salaries, to not give them raises, to penalize them. I think that would intimidate women into shutting up if they have no other job to go to. I think that would frighten them. They would be afraid to behave as you have described your own behavior. They’d be afraid they’d be fired. That makes them a threat. Refusing the advance and then getting in the face of the harasser and telling him off and then leaving, she now knows something and she’s not afraid.

She becomes a threat. So now she’s a target for either getting fired or other things. I think what you’re reacting to is what a lot of people are reacting to. All of these allegations of sexual harassment that are brought forth against politicians are viewed suspiciously because politics is politics, and politics corrupts things, and you are dubious, say, of women who sat silent for 38 years and then all of a sudden before an election claiming a guy attacked them or did something as in the Roy Moore case.

And some of these other charges. Like these allegations against Trump now. You don’t believe these women are traumatized like they’re trying to tell you they are. You think this is being done to gain political advantage and you’re standing up and defending the people being accused. I totally understand. I think there are two different things here, and real sexual harassment’s being corrupted yet again by the Democrat Party.


RUSH: Trump Tweets Because ‘He Loves Wrapping The Drive-Bys Around His Little Finger’

RUSH: How many times a day do you encounter stories or people on TV asking, theorizing, “Why does Trump do this? Why does Trump tweet so much? Why can’t Trump stop? These tweets, gotta be the end of him. Somebody needs to tell Trump he needs to stop tweeting.”

How many of you have an idea why he does it? I’ll tell you what it isn’t. A lot of people think Trump does it because it’s the only way he can get his side of the news out there. That’s not why he does this. That’s not why he tweets multiple times a day. I mean, it’s a result. He does get his side of the news out there. He does combat the narratives that the Drive-Bys report.

But that’s not technically why he does it. There are actually many reasons why he does it. But the first and foremost reason why he does it is because he loves toying with these people. He loves wrapping the Drive-Bys around his little finger. He loves tweaking ’em, just like I do.

I love getting close to the line of saying things that I know are gonna upset ’em and send ’em into all kinds of convulsions just for the fun of doing it, and that is a large part of why Trump does this, just to create the reaction that he gets. From Kirsten Gillibrand, the reaction tweet: “You cannot silence me or the millions of women who have gotten off the sidelines to speak out about the unfitness and shame you have brought to the Oval Office.” So Trump reads the reaction and says, “Bingo. Success. They’re reacting to me.”

You know what a bad day for Trump is? When his name’s not in the paper, when people aren’t talking about him, when he hasn’t irritated somebody. If two days where Trump hasn’t irritated somebody go by, he’s gonna fix it. And they can’t… They’re used to presidents and very powerful political people not acting this way. “This is… This is… This is not decent! You’re not supposed to share what you think. You’re not supposed to provoke your opponent this way. You’re not supposed to laugh at them, make fun of them.

“You’re not supposed to do this. This is so unseemly. It’s unpresidential.” They can’t stand it, and they can’t stand that Trump loves it, and they can’t stand that Trump gets pleasure from it. And they can’t stand that Trump’s supporters love it and want more of it. They keep feeding him. Against their best interests, they keep feeding the guy. They’re in such perpetual outrage that they have lost focus. Just like this Russia thing. They are so immersed in it, they think it really happened. They do!

I’m convinced that they really do think it happened. It’s not that they’re knowingly trying to prove what they know is not true. They think it did, they’re so immersed in it. And likewise they think Trump is just such a low-rent scuz bucket that they don’t take the time to analyze how he’s toying with them. They haven’t the ability to see themselves as Wile E. Coyote. They see themselves as some great enforcer that’s gonna get rid of the people they don’t like. But of course that’s not working out for them, either.


RUSH: Trump Accusers Appearing On ‘Megyn Kelly’ Is A Democrat ‘STRATEGERY’

RUSH: So yesterday three or four of the women who accuse Trump of sexual misconduct resurfaced to demand that Congress investigate Trump’s past. Now, to those of us paying attention, this is obviously a strategy, and it is a written policy somewhere, and all of these events are happening according to a timeline and plan.

So they make Franken walk the plank, Weinstein’s walked the plank, any number of other prominent Democrats are being told to walk the plank, and after enough of them have done so, then they go out and get the Trump babes. And they were on with Megyn Kelly and I saw one interchange. One of the women claimed to be traumatized because Trump asked for her phone number. And Megyn Kelly dutifully said (paraphrasing exchange), “How did you feel when he asked for your phone number?”

“Well, I was scared. I knew I had to give it to him and I didn’t want to give it to him, but I did, oh, my God, it was stress, I can’t tell you. I didn’t want to give him the number, but I knew I had to so I did.”

“How did you feel when he asked for your phone number?” As though such a thing is life changing traumatic. That’s just one example. But the key here is that they are demanding that Congress investigate Trump’s past, and they’re also demanding that he resign the presidency. One of these Trump accusers, Samantha Holvey, said Monday that Trump ogled her and other Miss USA pageant contestants in their dressing room in 2006.

Trump ogled them. He just stared at them in their dressing room. Did Trump own this pageant back then? He owned it at some point. I just don’t know the date range. Imagine, my friends, ogling a beauty pageant contestant. I mean, that’s beyond the pale. What kind of reprobate pervert ogles a beauty pageant contestant? I mean, it never happens before, nobody ever does this.

Everybody knows that nobody civilized ogles beauty pageant contestants, particularly during the swimsuit competition. It never happens. You know as well as I do during the swimsuit competition at beauty pageants, the viewers are imagining the IQ and the intelligence of the women and are eagerly waiting for that section of the show where they get to show off how smart they are. Or they go to the bathroom. They do anything. They’re not interested in the swimsuit portion, right? There’s no ogling of beauty pageant contestants there.

And Trump is the owner of the pageant, obviously interested in putting the best face forward often as he can on these kinds of things. You know, if this is true, if Trump was really ogling beauty pageant contestants, he should resign, go to reeducation classes now. We’ve gotta get this right. We can’t have the president of the United States known as somebody who ogles beauty pageant contestants, can we? Who would ever think that ever happens? I was shocked when I heard this. I was literally stunned. Have you ever ogled a beauty pageant contestant? You have?


RUSH: I need to keep going on this Democrat strategy, because, folks, it’s amazing. They’re willing — they’re not just willing; they’re doing it! They are throwing a lot of Democrat elected officials and others overboard on sexual harassment allegations, and it’s clear why. Trump’s the target next — which means, I guess, the Russian collusion thing ain’t working out the way they had planned.


LIMBAUGH: There’s Not A Single Shred Of Evidence That The Russians Have Hacked Anything

RUSH: For those of you that missed the first hour, this is fundamentally important. There is no evidence that the Russians hacked anything. All there is: Good guess, supposition, informed guess, but there is no incontrovertible evidence. There is no proof. There’s not a single shred of evidence, folks, that the Russians have hacked anything, including the DNC server, including Podesta’s email. There’s no evidence. I know you’re sitting there saying, “Rush, that’s not true. That’s not.”

You think I’m making it up because you’ve been following it for a year, and most everybody has succumbed to this. Everybody’s been roped into thinking, “Oh, there’s gotta be some. They wouldn’t be spending this much time…” There’s none. It means that what Robert Mueller is pursuing is absolutely irrelevant and unnecessary and unchartered. There isn’t a crime! This could be shut down today. It is not justified, this entire thing that Mueller is doing. There is no crime underlying his investigation. There is no crime that he’s pursuing. He’s the looking for crimes and creating process crimes.

He’s creating crimes out of people testifying falsely or incorrectly to his investigators. He hasn’t found a substantive crime about anything that we have been told have gone on here. This investigation is wholly manufactured and unwarranted and unnecessary. And it proves that what really is going on here is Mueller looking for a case for which Trump could be impeached if the Democrats win the House in 2018, which means that Mueller is not gonna stop. All of this that Mueller is doing is predicated on the House switching control to the Democrats in 2018.

Mueller is preparing to turn over whatever if the Democrats win. How could there be collusion between Trump and Russia if they still haven’t proved that the Russians did anything? So a false report: “Russia Hacked into the U.S. Electric Grid to Deprive Americans of Heat During Winter.” Made up. Not true. “An anonymous group (PropOrNot) documented how major U.S. political sites are Kremlin agents,” a Washington Post story that as not true. “WikiLeaks has a long, documented relationship with Putin.” They ran in the U.K. Guardian.

They had to retract that. That isn’t true. ran a story that said, “A secret server between Trump and a Russian bank has been discovered.” They had to retract it, had to apologize, had to pull back. There isn’t a secret server between Trump and a Russian bank. Another story that a Russian TV network had “hacked C-SPAN and caused disruption in its broadcast.” That ran in Fortune mag. That wasn’t true. C-SPAN had not been hacked. “CrowdStrike finds Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app.” Not true.

CrowdStrike, by the way, is the outfit that was hired to investigate the Democrat National Committee computer network for the Russian hackery. The FBI still has not been allowed to see it because there isn’t any evidence the Russians hacked it. The Democrats wanted to say the Russians hacked it and FBI would have been able to prove they didn’t (or the FBI would have unable to prove they did), and so the FBI was not allowed. Instead, they hired CrowdStrike, and CrowdStrike, among other things, reported that the Russians have hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app.

Not true! They had to pull it back. How many of you remember this story: “Russians attempted to hack elections systems in 21 states”? Not true. That appeared in multiple news outlets. It had been recalled. It was not true. The Russians did not attempt “to hack election systems in 21 states.” What did happen was the Obama administration offered states a service to guarantee the security of their election systems. But there was no Russian hack of 21 election systems in 21 states.

And remember this story at CNN? They said, “Links have been found between Trump ally Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation.” Not true. They had to retract that. Three people were fired over it! And that’s just a small sample. It is embarrassing except the media is not embarrassed. To them, these are success stories. To them, they’re getting these lies out there. And they stay out there long enough for millions and millions to absorb them and believe them to be true before they are retracted.

And the same thing with what happened on Friday. CNN still, all they’ve done is offered a small correction. Their story was totally debunked and blown to smithereens. Their story was totally made up. Why would they believe these sources with no evidence? Look, I’m beating a dead horse here. This is just… It’s outrageous. The evidence of media complicity and lying and everything. Matt Lauer? All these guys claim they never knew about Matt Lauer. They all knew about Matt Lauer, and they all roasted him on the basis of these things they knew about him to be true.