LIMBAUGH: The Regime, Hillary, Michelle Obama Sympathize With Boko Haram

RUSH: “Two years ago the New York Times ran an op-ed titled, ‘In Nigeria, Boko Haram Is Not the Problem.'”  Two years ago.  And Greenfield, FrontPage magazine notes: “The op-ed contended that Boko Haram didn’t exist, that it was a peaceful splinter group and that the Nigerian army was worse than Boko Haram. …  The editorial warned the US not to give the impression that it supports Nigeria’s Christian president or it would infuriate Muslims and suggested that Christians might really be behind the Muslim terror attacks.”

That’s the New York Times.  If all you know is that the Nigerian government is Christian and that the Regime blames them for the existence of Boko Haram, because this Christian government does not appease Islamists in the country, that Boko Haram came into existence as a militant group, as a terror group because of a Christian government in Nigeria, then you know and have some context in understanding what Daniel Greenfield is saying here.  Which, again, is that the hashtag politics isn’t aimed at the terrorists; it’s aimed at helping them. 

The Regime, Hillary, Michelle Obama sympathize with Boko Haram.  They’re blaming the Christian Nigerian government for creating Boko Haram, and they want to get rid of the Nigerian government, because if you do that, if you appease the terror group by getting rid of the group you think is responsible for their existence, then you’ve made peace with them. You’ve made friends with them and they’ll leave us alone, or whatever convoluted thinking.  I’m sorry, my ability to comprehend liberalism only goes so far.

Read More @ RushLimbaugh.com

RELATED POST:

LIMBAUGH: Purpose Of The Hashtag Is Aimed At Destabilizing The Nigerian Government

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Comment

*